Rene Desacartes and David Hume Essay

Rene Descartes and David Hume were two prominent philosophers during the modern period. Many of their issues focused on the foundation of theology. Humes writings on the populace of idol ar different to Descartes. Descartes tries to prove Gods existence spell Hume tries to show the foolishness of believe in God. However, both(prenominal) philosophers fail to solve the issue because they both wield many arguments. The major issue between Descartes and Hume is their contrary systems on how the issue should be approached. Rene Descartes was an Enlightenment philosopher.He was too a rationalist. This is the opposite of empiricism as this theory claims that almost cognition can be get laidn a priori, in aimently of run across. This means that if God were to be proved then come would non necessarily be ingested as some truth. The explanation of wiz egotism is essential to Descartes thesis. That all object dealing except God be delusions promoted by the coherence of ex perience (Weissman) that is, our everlasting subjective experience of the innovation could be false, although God is known to be true.Having fixed that the empirical world and matter could be b arly the creation of a devil, Descartes decides to follow his own consciousness, which is the notwithstanding thing he could rely on. He is the symbol of person who only depends on himself and always thinks I am in situations. Descartes makes the un undeniable assumption that he is the carrier of his combined states. He states, It is so taken for granted(predicate) that it is I who doubt, who understand and who wish, that at that place is no need to add anything to explain it.This, as well as the truths of mathematics, is perceived clearly and straightforwardly. Clear and unmistakable ideas are very much relied on in the Cartesian philosophy of thinker for Descartes they are the necessary truths, grabbed by the intelligence. This central consciousness he claims equates to a person t he divisible personify as an elongated thing in space and time is finite, conflicting to the infinite, non- forcible, monadic soul. This distinction is the foundation of Cartesian ontological dualism.The judgment and body are separate materials, existing on their own. Descartes believed that he developed a method by breaking a problem down into parts, accept ideas that couldnt be doubted and getting rid of one conclusion from another. Descartes came to the conclusion that the universe has a mathematically logical structure providing a unified body of knowledge. He believed that in hostelry to obtain knowledge, there must be a normal method for achieving the truth, or any experience can not be a dependable source.David Hume was an empiricist which means that he believes all knowledge must come from experience, as there is no innate knowledge within the mind. If the existence of God were to be proved, it would require somebody to experience or suppose his existence from experien ce in some way, because reason alone is inadequate to prove his existence. Humes position about knowledge is skepticism, which means he doesnt believe we direct knowledge for certain things. He is heavily influenced by the two philosophers, Locke and Berkley.Hume is similar to Berkley but without the part of believing in God. He believes in the analysis of causation. For face you know your friend is in France when you receive a post card from them in France. Humes explanations are more concerned with a passive physical brain and a graphic order of mind the mind alone can tell us anything about the world. It contains an idea that simple and complex ideas are forgeed by direct perception of objects or self-reflection. Humes change incorporates an explanation on Lockes ambiguous use of idea.He refers respectively to perceptions of sensations and those of reflection. Simple ideas of Locke much(prenominal) as space and time became complex ideas for Hume. All perceptions are substanc es, capable of existence independent of the observer. Therefore we are perceptions, with a non-observable self. Furthermore since there can be no impression of self, the idea of identity is weak. It is important to know that in Humes plan in order for people to obtain knowledge of something they must experience it first.Descartes believed that everything known, depends on perception, but if perception doesnt defy evidence not only from itself but also from the outside world than it will not be able to verify anything. According to Hume, perceptions, can be cut down to impressions and ideas. Axioms, were self evident principals which were so clear and distinct that they could not be doubted, and then accepted as certain contents of knowledge. opposite word to Descartes belief that effects must come from a cause, Hume believed that causes are senseless and uncertain.This contrasts sharply with Descartes proposal of old and junior-grade qualities. The primary qualities of objects are their geometric, indubitable measurements such as their extension, mass and location in space. These are only indirectly perceived through the secondary qualities of appearance, such as colour and tangibility. Descartes seeks to avoid a merely representationalist stance and attempts to further justify a belief in an external reality beyond our mental field of perception, and show that it is dependent on God.This is closely linked with Descartes equivocation of clear and distinct ideas they refer both to the mathematical axioms of geometry in a triangle there is a certain fixed nature or essence or form of it, immutable and eternal, which has not been feigned by me, nor does it depend on me and to empirical statements about extension in space in the Fifth Meditation he seeks to discover something certain concerning material things